Tuesday, March 3, 2009

cliché vs avant-garde





Straight from my sketchbook:

We were assigned to find two images with the same subject. One was to be a cliché image, the other avant-garde.

My first image, which fulfilled the cliché role, is a typical portrait of children. The sun is shinning, they are running, and they couldn't be happier, perfect (yet slightly creepy) siblings.

The second image is one that I recently discovered in the 51 Venice Biennale Exhibition Book from 2005. Yes, the average art student is more likely to discover new art in a 4 year old Biennale book than discover it in the current year's biennale.
Either way, I thought this image by Eija-Lisa Ahtila, from a film called The Present, 2001, was a much more interesting interpretation of a child's portrait

Something else I read into this image as an avant-garde statement was the fact that the little girl's bright blonde hair was growing out and being replaced with a darker, "diry-blonde" color. To me, this signified youth leaving. I thought the idea was echoed by having the girl lay her head in a mud puddle, reflecting her muddy, blonde hair.
I dont' know. just one way to read it... I wish I would have seen the film!

2 comments:

  1. Wow. Both images are disturbing to me, but oddly enough the first one seems to be more disturbing. Creepy little kids...

    I feel that the second one is the child's exit from innocence. There is no more green grass, no more sunshine to light the way; this is a child's encounter with the difficult, beautiful world we live in. This is not to say that the sunshine and grass will never appear again - on the contrary, when faced with grass and sunshine, the child will have a yardstick by which to appreciate it.

    That was my take. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. great! and sometimes I do feel like i'm just laying in a puddle. Curious.

    dude, those kids are terrifying. : )

    ReplyDelete